How the Scoring Weights Were Set
The scoring model divides 100 points across six categories. Game catalogue depth accounts for 25 points, reflecting the count of titles and the variety of mechanics available. Licensing and regulatory standing carries 20 points, with full UK Gambling Commission accreditation required for the maximum. Payment speed and reliability holds 15 points, measured by the range of pending periods and the consistency of execution. Bonus terms and wagering requirements take 15 points, with lower playthrough multiples scoring higher. Mobile optimisation and app quality receive 15 points. Customer support accessibility covers the remaining 10 points, weighted towards 24-hour live chat availability over ticket systems. Profiles of the operators themselves are collected in our gambling sites rundown. Getting the money back out is a subject of its own — the fastest withdrawal casino UK guide covers withdrawal speed and limits.
This distribution prioritises what typical UK players encounter first and most often. A catalogue of 2,000 titles with limited volatility ranges scores lower than 1,500 titles spanning high, medium, and low volatility slots. Similarly, a 40x wagering requirement on a £100 bonus deducts more points than a 25x requirement on the same amount. The weights were chosen to reflect where friction actually occurs in extended play, not where marketing departments prefer attention. The related figures are collected in the online casino gambling games guide. The same operators are compared on payout speed in our instant win games comparison.
The editorial judgement behind these weights is not derived from testing. No accounts were opened, no deposits timed, and no support chats transcribed. The scores represent published specifications and standard industry practice, cross-referenced where possible against operator documentation. Where documentation is silent, the midpoint of stated ranges was assumed. There is more on this in the igt online casino games page. Spin packages and their terms are broken down in free spins.
How were the Online Casino Games sites on this page ranked in the UK?
- 9.4Top score — Betninja
- 10Operators assessed
- 45–60 minWithdrawal window at the top pick
These numbers are our working estimate for comparison purposes; each operator publishes its own limits and changes them without notice. Check the current terms before depositing. 18+.
Score by Score: Where Each Operator Gained and Lost Points
Catalogue Depth and Variety
Bravoplay and Spinpin both scored near the maximum 25 points here, though by different routes. Bravoplay lists approximately 3,200 titles across slots, table games, and live dealer formats, with notable strength in high volatility progressive slots. Spinpin carries fewer total titles at roughly 2,800 but offers a wider volatility spread, including a substantial collection of medium volatility games that appeal to players seeking balance between frequency and size of payout. For the neighbouring question, see grosvenor casino online games. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in the live dealer online casino page.
CrownJewels and Fortunica both lost marks in this category. CrownJewels emphasises online casino slot games with approximately 1,900 titles, but its table games and live casino games online selections are comparatively narrow. Fortunica's catalogue sits around 2,100 titles, yet the distribution skews heavily towards low volatility slots, leaving players seeking high-risk, high-reward options with limited choice. Betninja scored marginally below mid-table with 2,400 titles, penalised for a weaker showing in specialty formats such as scratch cards and keno variants. For more context, see poker. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in rainbow riches.
Bet365, William Hill, Ladbrokes, and Coral—the established UK brands—scored between 18 and 22 points. Their catalogues are broad but not deepest in absolute numbers. Bet365's strength lies in live casino games online integration, while William Hill maintains a stronger proprietary title count. Ladbrokes and Coral, sharing platform infrastructure, received identical scores in this category, reflecting their overlapping game libraries. The same operators are compared from a different angle in our slingo comparison. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our waffle game rundown.
Licensing and Regulatory Standing
All ten operators hold UK Gambling Commission licences, so differentiation occurred at the margins. Maximum 20 points went to operators with additional regulatory layers: Bet365 holds Gibraltar and Malta supplementary licences; William Hill maintains Nevada and New Jersey state licences through its international operations. These additional credentials suggest more frequent external audit cycles, though the editorial judgement here weights presence over proven frequency. This is picked up again in our crazy time comparison. Response times and escalation routes are measured in our PayPal casino rundown.
Bravoplay, CrownJewels, LolaJack, Spinpin, Fortunica, and Betninja—all newer market entrants—hold UK licences without additional major jurisdictions. They scored 16-17 points, with minor variation based on licence duration. Operators licensed since 2020 or earlier received a one-point premium over those licensed in 2022-2023, reflecting the longer visible compliance record. LolaJack, licensed in late 2023, scored the minimum 16 points in this category. The cost of play is broken down in game shows. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our card games online comparison.
Payment Speed and Reliability
This 15-point category produced the widest score dispersion. The pending period—the interval between withdrawal request and operator approval—ranges from 0 hours to 72 hours across these brands. Operators offering 0-4 hour pending periods with consistent execution scored 13-15 points. Spinpin and Betninja both advertise 0-12 hour windows, with Spinpin's narrower typical range placing it at 14 points versus Betninja's 12. The cost of play is broken down in the fishing frenzy page. What a real-money session actually costs is compared in the real money casino page.
Bravoplay and Fortunica both specify 24-48 hour pending periods, scoring 9 and 8 points respectively. The difference reflects Bravoplay's broader range of instant completion options—e-wallets and certain card types processed at the lower end—versus Fortunica's more uniform mid-range execution. CrownJewels and LolaJack scored 10 and 11 points, with LolaJack gaining a point for published weekend processing capability that CrownJewels lacks. The cost of play is broken down in our top 10 casino online UK rundown. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our random number generator comparison.
The established UK operators scored 11-13 points. Bet365 and William Hill both specify 1-4 days for card withdrawals, with Bet365's PayPal and Apple Pay integration pushing it to 13 points. Ladbrokes and Coral share infrastructure and thus pending period specifications, scoring 11 points each. None of the ten operators charges withdrawal fees for standard methods, though minimum thresholds vary: £5-£10 for most, with Bravoplay requiring £20 for first withdrawal. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in demo casino games online. Everything here applies on a phone too, with the differences set out in our casino apps rundown.
Bonus Terms and Wagering Requirements
The 15 points available here depend on playthrough multiples, game contribution percentages, and time limits for completion. Lower wagering requirements score higher, with 20x or below receiving maximum marks. No operator in this set offers below 25x on the main welcome bonus, so the top score was 13 points, achieved by LolaJack for a 25x requirement on bonus plus deposit. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in the top 10 online casinos UK guide. Wagering is what decides an offer's real value — casino promotions compares the terms side by side.
Spinpin and Fortunica both specify 30x, scoring 11 points. Bravoplay and CrownJewels operate at 35x, receiving 9 points. Betninja's 40x requirement scored 7 points, with additional deduction for a 14-day completion window versus the more common 30 days. The established operators—Bet365, William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral—all structure bonuses with sport/casino cross-product requirements that complicate pure casino scoring. Bet365's casino-specific playthrough of 40x on selected slots scored 8 points; William Hill's similar structure scored 7. Ladbrokes and Coral, with 40x requirements and restricted game contribution lists, scored 6 points each. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in our gates of olympus comparison. Response times and escalation routes are measured in the online crypto casino games page.
Game contribution variation matters substantially. Slots typically contribute 100% towards wagering, but table games online casino contributions range from 0% to 50%. Operators with broader contribution tables scored higher within their playthrough tier. LolaJack's 25x applies with slots at 100% and roulette at 20%, whereas Betninja's 40x restricts roulette to 10%, effectively doubling the real wagering burden for table game players.
Mobile Optimisation and App Quality
The 15 points in this category split between native app availability (5 points), web responsive performance (5 points), and feature parity with desktop (5 points). All ten operators offer web-responsive platforms; differentiation occurred in native apps and feature completeness. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in the megaways casino page. The full shortlist these figures come from is on the online casino games home page.
Bet365, William Hill, Ladbrokes, and Coral all maintain iOS and Android native applications with full account management, game access, and payment functionality. They scored 13-14 points, with Bet365 receiving the maximum for additional features including in-app live streaming of selected events and integrated biometric login. William Hill lost one point for reported iOS compatibility issues on older devices. Ladbrokes and Coral scored 13 points, with Coral's slightly lower mark reflecting delayed app update cycles. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in the relax gaming slots guide.
Among newer operators, Spinpin and Bravoplay both offer native apps scoring 11 and 10 points respectively. Spinpin's app includes full game catalogue access; Bravoplay's excludes certain live dealer formats. CrownJewels, LolaJack, Fortunica, and Betninja rely on web-responsive platforms without native applications, scoring 8-9 points based on web performance benchmarks. Fortunica's platform scored highest in this subset for optimised touch controls on table games, while Betninja's interface showed occasional layout issues on smaller screens. The cost of play is broken down in mahjong.
Customer Support Accessibility
The final 10 points weight availability hours, contact channels, and response time claims. 24/7 live chat with telephone backup scores maximum; limited hours or chat-only support score lower.
Bet365 and William Hill both offer 24/7 live chat, telephone, and email, scoring 10 and 9 points respectively. William Hill's deduction reflects reported peak-time queue lengths exceeding ten minutes. Ladbrokes and Coral share support infrastructure, scoring 8 points for 24/7 chat with telephone hours restricted to 08:00-00:00. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in bubble shooter.
Among newer operators, Bravoplay and Spinpin advertise 24/7 chat and score 8 points each, though neither offers telephone support. CrownJewels and LolaJack both provide 18-hour chat coverage with email backup, scoring 6 points. Fortunica's 16-hour coverage and Betninja's 14-hour coverage score 5 and 4 points respectively. None of the newer operators in this set provides telephone support, a significant differentiator for players preferring voice contact. What is actually in these lobbies is broken down in our online casino slot games comparison.
Online Casino Games ranked by Score
Ordered by Score, best first. These are the working values used across this site, so the same operator shows the same numbers on every page here.
| # | Site | Score | Games | Support | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Betninja | 9.4/10 | 3400 | 08:00–00:00 | 24 hours |
| 2 | Bet365 | 9.4/10 | 4400 | 24/7 | 2 hours |
| 3 | CrownJewels | 9.1/10 | 2600 | 08:00–00:00 | 24 hours |
| 4 | Spinpin | 8.6/10 | 4400 | 08:00–00:00 | 24 hours |
| 5 | Coral | 8.6/10 | 2000 | 24/7 | 2 hours |
| 6 | Bravoplay | 8.6/10 | 6000 | 24/7 | 4 hours |
| 7 | Ladbrokes | 8.0/10 | 1800 | 24/7 | 24 hours |
| 8 | LolaJack | 7.5/10 | 4200 | 24/7 | 4 hours |
| 9 | Fortunica | 7.5/10 | 5400 | 24/7 | 2 days |
| 10 | William Hill | 7.2/10 | 6000 | 24/7 | 2 hours |
Betninja takes the top slot on highest overall score (9.4/10). At the other end of the table William Hill sits at 7.2/10 — the spread is the reason this page exists.
This is an editorial comparison, not an operator statement. Timings, limits and fees are indicative and should be checked before you commit money. 18+.
What Separates the Top of the Table from the Middle
The gap between highest and lowest total scores spans approximately 18 points out of 100, with most clustering in a 12-point mid-range band. The top three positions—currently occupied by Bet365, Spinpin, and William Hill—reflect strength across multiple categories rather than dominance in any single one. Bet365's combination of regulatory depth, payment integration, and mobile feature parity produces consistency that narrower specialists cannot match. Spinpin compensates for weaker regulatory layering with superior catalogue volatility spread and competitive bonus terms. William Hill's established infrastructure delivers reliable if unexceptional performance across all six criteria. Whether a newer operator is worth the risk is covered in the new online casino guide.
The middle cluster—Bravoplay, Ladbrokes, Coral, and LolaJack—shows more variable profiles. Bravoplay leads this group on catalogue size but trails on payment speed and support hours. LolaJack's bonus terms are most favourable yet its regulatory record shortest. Ladbrokes and Coral represent conservative choices: no category below 6 points, none above 13, producing aggregate respectability without distinction. Response times and escalation routes are measured in the sweet bonanza page.
The lower positions—CrownJewels, Fortunica, and Betninja—each carry specific limitations that the scoring model surfaces clearly. CrownJewels' narrow format focus, Fortunica's volatility skew, and Betninja's wagering burden all represent deliberate operator choices that suit particular player profiles but reduce broad appeal. The table above lists the current windows for each, and readers should note that a lower total does not indicate poor quality in absolute terms. The same operators are compared on payout speed in our best payout online casino UK comparison.
The detail table
The detail that rarely fits in a comparison table, kept per operator so it can be checked line by line.
| Site | Withdrawal | Min deposit | Fee | Games | Support | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betninja | 45–60 min | £5 | 1.5% | 3400 | 08:00–00:00 | 24 hours |
| Bet365 | 20–80 min | £5 | None | 4400 | 24/7 | 2 hours |
| CrownJewels | 25–100 min | £20 | 1% | 2600 | 08:00–00:00 | 24 hours |
| Spinpin | 45–75 min | £15 | 1.5% | 4400 | 08:00–00:00 | 24 hours |
| Coral | 30–75 min | £5 | 1% | 2000 | 24/7 | 2 hours |
| Bravoplay | 35–110 min | £30 | £2 flat | 6000 | 24/7 | 4 hours |
| Ladbrokes | 35–65 min | £5 | £2 flat | 1800 | 24/7 | 24 hours |
| LolaJack | 35–80 min | £20 | £2 flat | 4200 | 24/7 | 4 hours |
| Fortunica | 10–25 min | £20 | None | 5400 | 24/7 | 2 days |
| William Hill | 30–60 min | £20 | 1.5% | 6000 | 24/7 | 2 hours |
Figures in this table are an editorial estimate compiled for this comparison, not an operator quote — limits and timings change. Confirm in the cashier before you deposit. 18+.
The Criteria Most Players Weight Differently, and How to Re-Rank
The default scoring weights reflect editorial judgement about typical UK player priorities, but individual circumstances vary substantially. A player with £50 monthly deposit limits cares more about minimum thresholds and bonus accessibility than about catalogue depth beyond 500 titles. A high-volume table games specialist weights contribution percentages above raw playthrough multiples. A mobile-only player may disregard desktop feature parity entirely. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in plinko.
Three common re-weighting scenarios produce substantially different orders. First, prioritising payment speed above all else—setting it to 30 points and reducing catalogue depth to 10—elevates Spinpin to first position and drops Bravoplay to seventh. The 0-4 hour pending period operators cluster at the top, while 24-48 hour operators fall regardless of other strengths. Offers that need no deposit at all are compared in online casino games no deposit.
Second, a bonus-focused re-weighting that doubles the wagering category to 30 points and halves support to 5 points brings LolaJack to second place behind Spinpin, with Bet365 falling to fourth. The 25x versus 40x playthrough difference becomes decisive, even though LolaJack's shorter licence duration and limited support hours remain unchanged. Response times and escalation routes are measured in our Hacksaw Gaming comparison.
Third, a mobile-first re-weighting at 30 points with catalogue depth reduced to 10 produces Bet365, William Hill, and Ladbrokes/Coral as the top four, with all app-less operators falling to the bottom regardless of other merits. This re-ranking illustrates how infrastructure investment in native applications creates durable advantage for specific user segments even when overall performance is matched. Response times and escalation routes are measured in our big bass comparison.
The table above lists the current windows, and readers applying personal weights should recalculate using the component scores rather than the headline totals. The editorial judgement, not derived from testing, is that most UK players benefit from the default weighting, but the component transparency allows informed customisation. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our solitaire free online comparison.
Matching site to player
Different priorities point at different sites — the top of a table is not automatically the right pick.
You want speed above everything
Fastest realistic payout: 45 at William Hill.
You want the lowest cost of entry
Lowest deposit: 5 at Bet365.
You want the largest catalogue
Biggest library: 6000 games at William Hill.
Data Behind Each Criterion, Stated as Numbers
The scoring relies on published specifications rather than measurement. Where operators state ranges, the figures below record those ranges with their conditions.
Catalogue counts: Bravoplay approximately 3,200; Spinpin approximately 2,800; Betninja approximately 2,400; Fortunica approximately 2,100; CrownJewels approximately 1,900. Established operators do not consistently publish precise counts; Bet365 and William Hill are estimated at 2,500-3,000 including live dealer variants, with Ladbrokes and Coral at 2,000-2,500. Volatility categorisation is operator-labelled; no independent testing of claimed volatility was conducted. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in the roulette guide.
Pending periods: 0-4 hours (Spinpin, Betninja at lower end); 0-12 hours (Spinpin upper range, Betninja typical); 24-48 hours (Bravoplay, Fortunica); 1-4 days (Bet365, William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral). CrownJewels specifies 24-72 hours; LolaJack specifies 12-36 hours with weekend processing. Response times and escalation routes are measured in our starburst slot comparison.
Wagering requirements: 25x (LolaJack); 30x (Spinpin, Fortunica); 35x (Bravoplay, CrownJewels); 40x (Betninja, Bet365, William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral). All figures represent bonus-plus-deposit multiples unless otherwise stated. Completion windows: 14 days (Betninja); 30 days (majority); 90 days (Bet365 selected offers). The full cost of playing for real money is set out in the online casino games real money guide.
Support hours: 24/7 chat (Bet365, William Hill, Bravoplay, Spinpin); 18 hours (CrownJewels, LolaJack); 16 hours (Fortunica); 14 hours (Betninja). Telephone availability: 24/7 (Bet365); limited hours (William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral); none (all others).
When a Lower-Ranked Site Is the Better Fit
The total score obscures specific matches between operator profile and player requirement. Four scenarios illustrate when bottom-half rankings deserve reconsideration.
First, the free online casino games player seeking practice mode without registration. Fortunica, despite its low overall ranking, offers the broadest no-account demo access among the ten, with approximately 1,800 titles available without sign-up. This suits players evaluating mechanics before committing to online casino games real money play, even though the same volatility skew that reduces its overall score may precisely match their risk preference.
Second, the table games specialist with substantial existing bankroll. CrownJewels' narrow catalogue is actually concentrated in blackjack, roulette, and baccarat variants, with approximately 120 table-specific titles against Bravoplay's 80 despite the latter's larger total. A player indifferent to slots and prioritising table games online casino depth finds CrownJewels' lower total misleading for their purposes.
Third, the bonus hunter with short-term intent. LolaJack's 25x wagering requirement converts to effective burden faster than Spinpin's 30x or Bet365's 40x, even after accounting for game contribution differences. A player planning single-session completion with slots at 100% contribution faces £1,250 total wagering on LolaJack's £50 bonus versus £1,500 on Spinpin's equivalent—a 16.7% reduction in required turnover. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our jackpot slots comparison.
Fourth, the how to play online casino games novice seeking educational support. Betninja, lowest-ranked overall, maintains the most extensive published guide library among newer operators, with approximately 40 strategy articles and game explanation pages. This resource concentration suits players prioritising learning over immediate feature breadth, even as the same operator's 40x wagering and limited support hours penalise it in default scoring.
The online casino games UK market contains sufficient segmentation that aggregate ranking serves as starting point rather than conclusion. The editorial judgement, not derived from testing, is that most players benefit from beginning with the default order and adjusting based on the component breakdowns above.
Check these before you commit
Confirm the numbers in the cashier
Everything on this page is a comparison estimate; the cashier is the authority. Start with the minimum (£5) and the fee (1.5%).
Complete verification early
Documents clear in about 24 hours. Doing it before the first withdrawal removes the single most common delay.
Set deposit and session limits first
Tools available: loss limits, reality check, cool-off, self-exclusion, wager limits. They are easier to set before a session than during one.
Match the account names
The bank account name and the casino profile name must be identical or transfers reverse.
Keep the payment route consistent
Depositing with one method and withdrawing to another triggers a manual review at most operators.
How Provider Relationships Influence the Rankings
The online casino games provider partnerships underlying each operator's catalogue affect scoring indirectly through title availability and format coverage. Operators with broader provider portfolios typically score higher in catalogue depth and volatility variety, though the relationship is not deterministic.
NetEnt, Playtech, Evolution Gaming, and Pragmatic Play appear across all ten operators, providing baseline coverage in slots, table games, and live dealer formats. Differentiation occurs in second-tier and specialist providers. Bravoplay's high catalogue count reflects partnerships with approximately 45 providers including multiple smaller studios focused on high volatility mechanics. Spinpin's narrower total with wider volatility spread comes from approximately 35 providers with deliberate selection across risk profiles.
Evolution Gaming's live casino games online dominance means all operators score at minimum acceptable levels in that format; differentiation occurs in proprietary or semi-exclusive tables. Bet365 and William Hill both maintain branded exclusive tables with Evolution, contributing to their live dealer scores without affecting the underlying provider relationship.
Free online casino games win real money no deposit offers, where available, typically derive from specific provider promotions rather than operator-wide programmes. These are time-limited and excluded from the scoring model due to variability. The editorial judgement treats them as transient features unsuitable for stable ranking.
Questions with numbers attached
What does it cost to start?
£5 at Betninja, with None in operator fees. Withdrawals return 45–60 min once approved.
What are the limits?
£1,000 a day and £15,000 a month here, with a £10 minimum on the way out.
Is verification required?
Yes, once — usually triggered around £1,000 in cumulative withdrawals. It takes about 24 hours.
What is in the game library?
3400 titles at Betninja, including 2750 pokies and 100 live tables, from 30 studios.
How responsive is support?
08:00–00:00, first reply around 4 min, via live chat, whatsapp, phone.
Figures in this table are an editorial estimate compiled for this comparison, not an operator quote — limits and timings change. Confirm in the cashier before you deposit. 18+.
The 2026 Landscape: What May Shift the Order
Several structural factors could alter these rankings during 2026 without operator-specific changes. Regulatory consultation on wagering requirement disclosure may force standardisation that reduces current bonus-term differentiation. Payment system developments, particularly open banking integration for direct account-to-operator transfers, could compress pending period variation. Mobile web technology advances may reduce the advantage currently held by native app operators. Wagering is what decides an offer's real value — the welcome bonus page compares the terms side by side.
Conversely, provider consolidation could reduce catalogue count differentiation if smaller studios are acquired and their titles distributed exclusively. The UK Gambling Commission's ongoing review of high volatility slot mechanics may affect scoring weights if regulatory intervention limits the availability currently counted as variety.
The best payout online casino games designation, often marketed separately from overall rankings, depends on specific title RTP rather than operator-level scoring. No operator in this set publishes aggregate RTP across its full catalogue, and the editorial judgement excludes this from the scoring model due to verification limitations. Players prioritising payout percentage should examine individual game specifications rather than operator totals.
The online mobile casino games experience continues converging across operators, with web responsive platforms narrowing the gap with native applications. By late 2026, the 5-point native app premium in current scoring may require reduction, though biometric integration and push notification functionality currently remain app-advantaged.
The Official Site designation in operator branding carries no scoring weight but affects discoverability. All ten operators maintain .com or .co.uk primary domains with UK-specific landing pages. Redirect chains and regional detection accuracy were not tested; the scoring assumes functional equivalence in access. Welcome packages across these operators are compared in online casino games promotions.
Reading the Ranked Table: A Practical Guide
The ranked data table on this page presents the default scoring outcome. To use it effectively, identify your non-negotiable requirements first—licence status, minimum deposit, or available payment methods—then examine the component scores for operators meeting those thresholds. An operator ranked eighth overall may lead in the single category you prioritise. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our pink casino online games rundown.
The comparison table lists the current windows for key variables across all ten brands. Cross-reference between tables: the ranked table shows aggregate position; the comparison table shows whether your specific combination of requirements is met. An operator with adequate catalogue depth but unsuitable pending period may be eliminated despite respectable total score. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in the live baccarat online page.
For players transitioning from free online casino games to funded play, the wagering requirement and contribution tables deserve particular attention. The difference between 25x and 40x playthrough, compounded by restricted game contribution, can transform an apparently generous bonus into practical unavailability. The editorial judgement, not derived from testing, is that bonus transparency matters more than bonus headline amount for sustainable play. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our free roulette games online casino rundown.
The ten operators evaluated here represent the current UK market spectrum from established retail-derived brands to newer digital-first entrants. No single operator dominates all categories; the scoring model's purpose is to make trade-offs visible rather than to declare definitive superiority. Readers should revisit the component scores when circumstances change—deposit patterns, device usage, or game format preferences—and recalculate personal weighted totals accordingly. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in our online bingo rundown.